Hi,
This is to let you guys on the JSR 47 expert group know that I agree
with most of the points brought up by Ceki in his discussion of JSR
47:
I guess it's not essential to have the JSR 47 API be all singing, all
dancing in its first incarnation, but it would be unfortunate if the
design precludes the sort of improvements mentioned by Ceki in later
versions (and while I haven't looked very closely at JSR 47, I
suspect
many more points could be made).
Regards,
Anders Kristensen
logj4 developer and spec lead for JSR 116