Delivered-To: cgu@qos.ch
To: java-logging-input@eng.sun.com
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:10:48 +1000
From: "Lewis Gardner" <lewisgardner@lycos.com>
Cc: cgu@qos.ch
X-Sent-Mail: on
Reply-To: lewisgardner@lycos.com
X-Mailer: MailCity Service
Subject: (No Subject)
X-Sender-Ip: 202.139.121.81
Organization: Lycos Mail  (http://mail.lycos.com:80)

Dear Sirs,

The current situation regarding the upcoming java logging facility as described in http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique.html mirrors my doubts about the JSR 47 specification exactly. As a consultant I work with a large number of organisations developing in Java and log4j has definitely established itself as a sound and proven standard. I ask you to reconsider the current JSR 47 specification in favour of closer resembling log4j.

Thank you,

Owen Lewis Gardner
Software Development Consultant
Sydney, Australia



Get 250 color business cards for FREE!
http://businesscards.lycos.com/vp/fastpath/